Head Neck Pathol. 2019 Mar;13(1):1-3. doi: 10.1007/s12105-019-01007-3. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
FIRST PARAGRAPH: Nearly all surgical pathologists will encounter oral mucosal biopsies in their day to day practice. Many of these biopsies are fraught with diagnostic difficulty and may be challenging, usually due to inadequate clinical information, an unfamiliarity with anatomic landmarks and/or terminology used by the submitting physician or dentist, and the often limited size of the sample. A clinical description and history to accompany the submitted biopsy is often essential to the proper diagnosis and subsequent treatment of many oral conditions. A clinical history is a requirement recognized by the College of American Pathologist (CAP). The value and utility of a clinical history in the practice of pathology is undisputed. However, between 5.9 and 8.4% of cases submitted for pathologic review have no clinical history, or include vague information like “lesion,” “bump” or “ulcer.” Often the exact anatomic site is not included, stating only “oral cavity,” or “soft tissue” without any further designation as to exact anatomic site. This lack of important information may result in less than ideal interpretations. Additionally, concise clinical histories have been associated with shorter sign-out turnaround times. Pathologists find it too difficult to communicate with providers to obtain additional clinical information, claiming they are not in the office, they don’t return messages, or clinicians are too busy to be bothered. With nearly ubiquitous access to photography, the old adage, “A picture is worth a thousand words,” would seem to go a long way towards providing further clinical information. The clinical appearance, with the various nuances of color, texture and location are well suited to clinical photography. Cerroni et al., studied the utility of submitting clinical photographs with biopsy requests to dermatopathologists. The study showed that clinical photographs facilitated better pathology interpretation. Further, Ferrara et al., highlighted that clinical photographs do not introduce bias into the diagnosis of melanocytic lesion of the skin. There is a long held misconception by many physicians and dentists that clinically describing the sampled lesion unduly biases the pathologist: how patently false. Clear and concise clinical descriptions of mucosal lesions are essential to developing an appropriate differential diagnosis and a subsequent accurate interpretation. In an effort to highlight the importance of these characteristics, the topics covered by the contributing authors to this special issue have been divided by color, texture and location.
PubMed ID: 30693461
Article Size: <1 MB